Saṃyutta Nikāya
3. Khandha Vagga
22. Khandha Saṃyutta
15. Diṭṭhi Vagga
The Book of the Kindred Sayings
3. The Book Called the Khandhā-Vagga
Containing Kindred Sayings on the Elements of Sensory Existence and other Subjects
22. Kindred Sayings on Elements
15. On View
Sutta 154
Sakkāya-Diṭṭhi Suttaṃ
The Person-Pack
Translated by F. L. Woodward
Edited by Mrs. Rhys Davids
Copyright The Pali Text Society
Commercial Rights Reserved
For details see Terms of Use.
[1] Thus have I heard:
The Exalted One was once staying near Sāvatthī
at the Jeta Grove in Anāthapiṇḍika's Park.
And there the Exalted One addressed the brethren, saying:
"Brethren!"
"Master!" responded those brethren.
The Exalted One said:
"There being what, brethren,
by clinging to what,
depend ing upon what,
does the person-pack view arise?"
"For us, lord, things have the Exalted One as their root
their guide,
their resort.
Well indeed if the meaning of these words
should show itself in the Exalted One."
■
"There being a body, brethren,
by clinging to body,
depending on body,
the person-pack view arises.
There being feeling, brethren,
by clinging to feeling,
depending on feeling,
the person-pack view arises.
There being perception, brethren,
by clinging to perception,
depending on perception,
the person-pack view arises.
There being the activities, brethren,
by clinging to the activities,
depending on the activities,
the person-pack view arises.
There being consciousness, brethren,
by clinging to consciousness,
depending on consciousness,
the person-pack view arises.
■
As to that, what think ye, brethren?
Is body permanent or impermanent?"
"Impermanent, lord."
"That which is impermanent,
is it weal or woe?"
"Woe, lord."
"Then without a clinging
to what is impermanent,
woeful,
by nature changeable,
could the person-pack view arise?"
"Surely not, lord."
■
"Is feeling permanent or impermanent?"
"Impermanent, lord."
"That which is impermanent,
is it weal or woe?"
"Woe, lord."
"Then without a clinging
to what is impermanent,
woeful,
by nature changeable,
could the person-pack view arise?"
"Surely not, lord."
■
"Is perception permanent or impermanent?"
"Impermanent, lord."
"That which is impermanent,
is it weal or woe?"
"Woe, lord."
"Then without a clinging
to what is impermanent,
woeful,
by nature changeable,
could the person-pack view arise?"
"Surely not, lord."
■
"Are the activities permanent or impermanent?"
"Impermanent, lord."
"That which is impermanent,
is it weal or woe?"
"Woe, lord."
"Then without a clinging
to what is impermanent,
woeful,
by nature changeable,
could the person-pack view arise?"
"Surely not, lord."
■
"Is consciousness permanent or impermanent?"
"Impermanent, lord."
"That which is impermanent,
is it weal or woe?"
"Woe, lord."
"Then without a clinging
to what is impermanent,
woeful,
by nature changeable,
could the person-pack view arise?"
"Surely not, lord."
§
"Wherefore, brethren, he who thus sees
conceives disgust at body,
at feeling,
at perception,
at the activities,
at consciousness.
Being disgusted
he is repelled by them;
by that repulsion he is released;
by that release he is set free;
knowledge arises:
in the freed man is the freed thing,
and he knows:
'Destroyed is rebirth;
lived is the righteous life;
done is the task;
for life in these conditions
there is no hereafter.'"
