Saṃyutta Nikāya
3. Khandha Vagga
22. Khandha Saṃyutta
6. Upāya Vagga
Sutta 59
Pañca or Anatta-Lakkhana Suttaṃ
The Discourse on the Not-self Characteristic
Translated from the Pali by Thanissaro Bhikkhu.
Proofed against and modified in accordance with the revised edition at dhammatalks.org
Provenance, terms and conditons
This discourse is also known as the Anatta-lakkhaṇa Sutta, the Discourse on the Not-self Characteristic. According to Mv I, this was the first of the Buddha's discourses during which his listeners became arahants.
[1][bit][pts][nymo][mend][olds][bodh] I have heard that on one occasion the Blessed One was staying near Vārāṇasī in the Deer Park at Isipatana.
There he addressed the group of five monks:
"Form, monks, is not self.
If form were the self, this form would not lend itself to dis-ease.
It would be possible (to say) with regard to form, 'Let my form be thus.
Let my form not be thus.'
But precisely because form is not self, this form lends itself to dis-ease.
And it is not possible (to say) with regard to form, 'Let my form be thus.
Let my form not be thus.'
"Feeling is not self....
"Perception is not self....
"Fabrications are not self....
"Consciousness is not self.
If consciousness were the self, this consciousness would not lend itself to dis-ease.
It would be possible (to say) with regard to consciousness, 'Let my consciousness be thus.
Let my consciousness not be thus.'
But precisely because consciousness is not self, consciousness lends itself to dis-ease.
And it is not possible (to say) with regard to consciousness, 'Let my consciousness be thus.
Let my consciousness not be thus.'
"What do you think, monks?
Is form constant or inconstant?"
"Inconstant, lord."
"And is that which is inconstant easeful or stressful?"
"Stressful, lord."
"And is it fitting to regard what is inconstant, stressful, subject to change as:
'This is mine.
This is my self.
This is what I am'?"
"No, lord."
"... Is feeling constant or inconstant?" —
"Inconstant, lord." ...
"... Is perception constant or inconstant?" —
"Inconstant, lord." ...
"... Are fabrications constant or inconstant?" —
"Inconstant, lord." ...
"What do you think, monks?
Is consciousness constant or inconstant?"
"Inconstant, lord."
"And is that which is inconstant easeful or stressful?"
"Stressful, lord."
"And is it fitting to regard what is inconstant, stressful, subject to change as:
'This is mine.
This is my self.
This is what I am'?"
"No, lord."
"Thus, monks, any form whatsoever that is past, future, or present; internal or external; blatant or subtle; common or sublime; far or near:
Every[1] form is to be seen with right discernment as it has come to be:
'This is not mine.
This is not my self.
This is not what I am.'
"Any feeling whatsoever....
"Any perception whatsoever....
"Any fabrications whatsoever....
"Any consciousness whatsoever that is past, future, or present; internal or external; blatant or subtle; common or sublime; far or near:
Every[1] consciousness is to be seen with right discernment as it has come to be:
'This is not mine.
This is not my self.
This is not what I am.'
"Seeing thus, the instructed disciple of the noble ones grows disenchanted with form, disenchanted with feeling, disenchanted with perception, disenchanted with fabrications, disenchanted with consciousness.
Disenchanted, he becomes dispassionate.
Through dispassion, he is released.
With release, there is the knowledge, 'Released.'
He discerns that 'Birth is ended, the holy life fulfilled, the task done.
There is nothing further for this world.'"
That is what the Blessed One said.
Gratified, the group of five monks delighted in the Blessed One's words.
And while this explanation was being given, the minds of the group of five monks, through lack of clinging/sustenance, were released from effluents.
[1] The word "every" here and in all parallel passages is sabba, which is the same as the word for "all." On the range of meaning covered by the word "all," see SN 35:23. DN 11, DN 15, MN 49, and AN 10:81 indicate that there is a type of consciousness that lies outside the range of "all," and so would not fall under the aggregate of consciousness. This apparently corresponds to the dimension mentioned in SN 35:117 and Ud 8:1.
Of Related Interest:
